This was discussed some time ago. I think it's unnecessary. On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:28:15PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-02-26, 22:17): > > > I'd like to get rid of regexp matching in rules, any complains? > > Does anyone really uses them? > > I think I just use substring match. Will this be sufficient? > > Best, > > -- > [a]
- [dwm] regex in rules? Anselm R. Garbe
- Re: [dwm] regex in rules? Antoni Grzymala
- Re: [dwm] regex in rules? pancake
- Re: [dwm] regex in rules? Tuncer Ayaz
- Re: [dwm] regex in rules? Anselm R. Garbe
- Re: [dwm] regex in rules? Tuncer Ayaz
- Re: [dwm] regex in rules? Anselm R. Garbe
- Re: [dwm] regex in rules? Henry Bubert
