On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > > Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06): > > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > > > > anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I > > > > have to fiddle with bh or something else to emulate BarOff. > > > > what's the correct way? > > > > > > DEFGEOM(nobar, 0, -bh, sw, 0, 0, sw, sh, wx, wy, mfact*ww, wh, > > > mx+mw, wy, ww-mw, wh, wx, wy, ww, wh) > > > > LOL. > > > > Sorry, I couldn't resist. > > Well if DEFGEOM would only be used to hide the bar, I could > agree that it's ridiculous.
I think Antoni laughed about the two-character variable name and me applying the verb 'fiddle' to it. Actually I had to take a look at my mail for a second to find the funny part :)
