2008/5/15 Eric Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:56:02AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:06:22PM -0700, Eric Davis wrote: >> > DWM used to support regular expressions in the tags ref for client >> > rules. I agree that the feature was overkill but it was nice to be able >> > to say "*" so a client is on all tags. I used this for background >> > notification popups from scripts with gxmessage. >> > >> > Is it possible to add a simple glob indicator back to DWM that specifies >> > all tags? Or is there another way to do this that I overlooked...? >> >> See attached patch, however I'm not sure I like this approach >> for the mainstream dwm. >> >> If you want the behavior it is possible with the following >> approach already in mainstream dwm, but you might not like it: >> >> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[0], True }, >> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[1], True }, >> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[2], True }, >> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[3], True }, >> ... >> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[8], True }, >> > > Sometimes the simplest approaches are greatly overlooked! Having the > multiple tag rules works great and I think is a good solution. > > Note that, for me, you're patch caused dwm to hang. It wouldn't take > any keyboard input and no gxmessage windows were shown... but dwm did > respond to HUP and came back to life. > > Another solution which might be even better is to use dzen. > > Thanks, > - e > > >
Of course it crashed, did you correct the typo? The i++ in the for loop should be j++ -- - yiyus || JGL .