On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a) > that this is DWM and b) knows that DWM is licensed under MIT? So this > user does not have the freedom to use, study, share and improve the > software.
You think their ability to hack on dwm is destroyed by the fact that they can't identify it as dwm? I don't see how this follows. Googling "tiling window manager" turns up a ton of results, most of which are descended from dwm. -- # Kurt H Maier
