Hello,
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://code.suckless.org/dl/misc
Thanks for that. Really, I depend on that robust piece of code, which has
proven to be stable the
last years. Anyway I need to go deeper into the dwm evaluation period and see
if dwm can cope
Is there any trick to compile it? I absoulutely failed to compile it,
but i'm interested in wmi. If anybody cares, here the error:
Making all in src
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/fabio/misc/src/wmi-10/src'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Os -g -O2 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -c
-o inputbar.o inputbar.cpp
inputbar.cpp: In constructor 'InputBar::InputBar(Monitor*, Rectangle*)':
inputbar.cpp:34: error: no match for 'operator=' in
'((InputBar*)this)->InputBar::entryEnd_ = 0'
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.1/../../../../include/c++/4.3.1/bits/stl_tree.h:222: note: candidates are:
std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >&
std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::operator=(const
std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >&)
inputbar.cpp: In member function 'void InputBar::queryText(std::string)':
inputbar.cpp:236: error: no match for 'operator=' in
'((InputBar*)this)->InputBar::entryEnd_ = 0'
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.1/../../../../include/c++/4.3.1/bits/stl_tree.h:222: note: candidates are:
std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >&
std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::operator=(const
std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >&)
make[2]: *** [inputbar.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/fabio/misc/src/wmi-10/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/fabio/misc/src/wmi-10'
make: *** [all] Error 2
With best regards,
Fabio Scotoni
