On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 08:27:40 +0200 "Szabolcs Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/7/08, Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why not include the DWM wiki pages in a "doc/" directory in the source > > tarball? It wouldn't bump up the size significantly and it would greatly > > help a lot of users. I guess one could ask why not just go to the online > > browse the wiki? In my case, I find that I am not online most of the time > > and having the documentation at hand in the tarball is a great reference for > > when I want to configure DWM. > > the wiki is a mercurial repository, ie. you can clone the whole wiki > with revision history and browse it offline > That's a good idea. > the wiki may change more frequently than the dwm releases > How about whenever the tarball is released, a snapshot of the DWM wiki. > the wiki is huge compared to dwm ( >1MB when compressed without history) > > the wiki is a completely separate thing, we could include all the > suckless tools in dwm tarball by that logic > I wasn't talking about the whole wiki. Just the sections pertaining to DWM. For example, under suckless.org/dwm/ only the tuorial and the customisation section can be included (don't need the manpages, screenshots, etc): 1. /tutorial.html 2. /customisation - ./customfuncs.html - ./font.html - ./noapps.html - ./noinpu.html - ./patch_queue.html - ./tagmask.html - ./windows_key.html I'm sure the above once compressed will be less than a few kilobytes. Thanks, Amit
