I'm not happy with the archives of dwm: http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0809/index.html
An old program http://www.hypermail-project.org/ (51k SLOC) is used and I don't think it manages threads as well as mutt. Compare mutt's output: 2904 N 14/09 Johannes Wegener ( 0) [dwm] XCB? 2905 N 14/09 Anselm R Garbe ( 0) |-> 2906 N 14/09 Tobias Ulmer ( 0) | `-> 2907 N 14/09 Don Stewart ( 0) | |-> 2908 N 14/09 Kai Großjohann ( 0) | | `-> 2909 N 14/09 Anselm R Garbe ( 0) | `-> 2910 N 14/09 Donald Chai ( 0) `-> 2911 N 14/09 Anselm R Garbe ( 0) `-> With hypermail's: # [dwm] XCB? Johannes Wegener (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 10:02:34 UTC) * Re: [dwm] XCB? Anselm R Garbe (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 11:32:25 UTC) o Re: [dwm] XCB? Tobias Ulmer (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 17:23:34 UTC) + Re: [dwm] XCB? Don Stewart (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 19:00:34 UTC) + Re: [dwm] XCB? Kai Großjohann (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 20:49:53 UTC) + Re: [dwm] XCB? Anselm R Garbe (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 20:02:02 UTC) * Re: [dwm] XCB? Donald Chai (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 15:28:24 UTC) o Re: [dwm] XCB? Anselm R Garbe (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 20:12:46 UTC) Besides looking ugly, Kai's reply isn't properly indented at the third(?) level. I was wondering if anyone more competent than I has looked through mutt's threading source or at least thought about writing a better Web mail archival tool. Or perhaps a better tool exists for putting mail boxes on the Web? I think in the case of the suckless community, you can perhaps assume message id references will not get b0rked, so the implementation could be simpler. nn,
