On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:09:11PM +0100, henry atting wrote:
> Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 -
>
> > 2008/12/13 henry atting <nspm...@literaturlatenight.de>:
> >>> 2008/12/13 henry atting <nspm...@literaturlatenight.de>:
> >>> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume
> >>> it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4
> >>> codebase.
> >>
> >> Mmh, I am not very familiar with patching, I did it this way:
> >>
> >> ,----
> >> | do! patch -p1 < dwm-5.2-arrownav.diff
> >> | missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
> >> | can't find file to patch at input line 3
> >> | Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> >> | The text leading up to this was:
> >> | --------------------------
> >> | |--- config.def.h Tue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
> >> | |+++ config.def.h Tue Nov 18 19:26:53 2008
> >> | --------------------------
> >> | File to patch: config.def.h
> >> | patching file config.def.h
> >> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 62 (offset 1 line).
> >> | missing header for unified diff at line 14 of patch
> >> | can't find file to patch at input line 14
> >> | Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> >> | The text leading up to this was:
> >> | --------------------------
> >> | |--- dwm.c Tue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
> >> | |+++ dwm.c Tue Nov 18 19:31:55 2008
> >> | --------------------------
> >> | File to patch: dwm.c
> >> | patching file dwm.c
> >> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 197 (offset -1 lines).
> >> | Hunk #2 FAILED at 1668.
> >> | 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dwm.c.rej
> >> `----
> >
> > Well as I said, you will need to patch it manually, since the lines
> > have changed and the heuristic approach supported by patch(1) isn't
> > succeeding either.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > --Anselm
>
> I see, great thanks
> henry
Henry,
Attached is an updated arrownav patch [0] that should apply to dwm tip
cleanly.
[0] http://bsdgroup.org/files/dwm-5.4-arrownav.diff
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
--- config.def.h Sat Dec 13 12:39:14 2008
+++ config.def.h Sat Dec 13 12:36:21 2008
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ static Key keys[] = {
{ MODKEY, XK_l, setmfact, {.f = +0.05}
},
{ MODKEY, XK_Return, zoom, {0} },
{ MODKEY, XK_Tab, view, {0} },
+ { MODKEY, XK_Right, viewnext, {0} },
+ { MODKEY, XK_Left, viewprevious, {0} },
{ MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_c, killclient, {0} },
{ MODKEY, XK_t, setlayout, {.v =
&layouts[0]} },
{ MODKEY, XK_f, setlayout, {.v =
&layouts[1]} },
--- dwm.c Sat Dec 13 12:39:15 2008
+++ dwm.c Sat Dec 13 12:38:48 2008
@@ -198,6 +198,8 @@ static void updatestatus(void);
static void updatetitle(Client *c);
static void updatewmhints(Client *c);
static void view(const Arg *arg);
+static void viewnext(const Arg *arg);
+static void viewprevious(const Arg *arg);
static int xerror(Display *dpy, XErrorEvent *ee);
static int xerrordummy(Display *dpy, XErrorEvent *ee);
static int xerrorstart(Display *dpy, XErrorEvent *ee);
@@ -1631,6 +1633,40 @@ view(const Arg *arg) {
seltags ^= 1; /* toggle sel tagset */
if(arg->ui & TAGMASK)
tagset[seltags] = arg->ui & TAGMASK;
+ arrange();
+}
+
+void
+viewnext(const Arg *arg) {
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for(i = 0; i < LENGTH(tags); i++) {
+ if((1 << i & TAGMASK) == tagset[seltags]) {
+ seltags ^= 1;
+ if(i == LENGTH(tags) - 1)
+ tagset[seltags] = 1 << 0 & TAGMASK;
+ else
+ tagset[seltags] = 1 << (i + 1) & TAGMASK;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ arrange();
+}
+
+void
+viewprevious(const Arg *arg) {
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for(i = 0; i < LENGTH(tags); i++) {
+ if((1 << i & TAGMASK) == tagset[seltags]) {
+ seltags ^= 1;
+ if(i == 0)
+ tagset[seltags] = 1 << (LENGTH(tags) - 1) &
TAGMASK;
+ else
+ tagset[seltags] = 1 << (i - 1) & TAGMASK;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
arrange();
}
