On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Dusan wrote: > Please keep bar, that's why dwm is great out of the box.
Agreed. A window manager should be usable on its own, and have sensible defaults. Ability to customize is great, but it shouldn't be depended upon to make for a decent user experience. > No. Adding exceptions will increase code and you can't possibly cover > all broken applications. Yeah, I wouldn't bend over backwards to support these. With wmname, Java apps work fine for me. > > Please feel free to comment or add other ideas to this list. Only things I can think of are better integrated multi-head support (I have yet to try Guillaume's patch) and XCB. It's basically perfect otherwise.