On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Kurt H Maier <karmaf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Mate Nagy <mn...@port70.net> wrote: >> I strongly believe that the major problem of dwm currently is >> not font handling (8bit ascii bitmap fonts are perfectly fine thank >> you); > > Agree 100%. Folks, if you want unicode support, develop a sane, > working implementation.
Exactly. > I've never seen one that matches both "sane" and "working." http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/utf There you go ;) But I agree with your point in the X11 context (although see http://plan9.us) uriel > >> 1. Complete lack of proper xrandr and multi monitor support - this is >> solved in multiple tiling wms, there's no reason other than lack of >> interest or obscure ideology not to do this. > > Here's a patch to make DWM work fine on a two-monitor side-by-side setup: > > --- dwm.c~ 2009-02-08 06:10:49.000000000 -0600 > +++ dwm.c 2009-02-25 18:54:17.000000000 -0600 > @@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ > c = nexttiled(clients); > mw = mfact * ww; > adjustborder(c, n == 1 ? 0 : borderpx); > - resize(c, wx, wy, (n == 1 ? ww : mw) - 2 * c->bw, wh - 2 * c->bw, > resizehints); > + resize(c, wx, wy, mw - 2 * c->bw, wh - 2 * c->bw, resizehints); > > if(--n == 0) > return; > > > ...that's from dwm 5.4.1, using xrandr --output DVI-0 --right-of > DVI-1. Problem solved. > > # Kurt H Maier > >
