I could not stop thinking of this concept since I read this post. Mostley because I have fooled around with ratpoison a bit the last weeks. So tonight I sat down and tried to realise some of the ideas with dwm-5.5 as foundation. It is almost only cut'n'paste from the source and removing some parts.
I have kept mwfac because I think i maybe nice to have a layout where the screen is split into two sections (just realised I should have kept zoom() then). Floating layout is still there because I think it is nice to be able to handle floats and apps like gimp in a flexible fashion. Client numbering is a bit screwed up to. This because clients are added to the list of clients in a fifo fashion and I have not figured out how to change this behavior. Do I need to change booth attach and attachstack? And I hope I have not screwed up in some licensing manner. Here it is I some one would like to check it out. http://web.student.chalmers.se/~rickardg/mwm-0.0.tar.gz Regards Rickard Gustafsson On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Leandro Chescotta <leandro.chesco...@gmail.com> wrote: > minimal/minimum/monocle window manager, this come to my head today, when i > meet antiwm http://sourceforge.net/projects/antiwm this is like dwm, but > with no tags, no bottom bar, no layouts, more like ratpoison, the thing is > that i tryed ratpoison and antiwm, and it lacks a couple of things, so, i > see that suckless have wmii, stripping down there is dwm, and why not a > smaller one like a suckless antiwm... mwm! :) this are the things i think > mwm need... > > - no tags, only a "list" of opened windows, that you can cycle with one > keybinding or Alt+number > - no bottom bar, just the window list that you can show/hide > - no layouts, only a monocle-like one, and a floating "layer" for > mplayer/feh/gimp > - lol, an arch linux AUR package with the config.h ready to customize the > few font/colors/keybindings/apps > > maybe this is not worthy, but i like the idea, maybe you too, maybe is like > getting dwm code and strip it down a little, only, maybe not... >
