I see some time ago that there is a framebuffer option like X as I recall, maybe im confuse and didn't understand what that where, but I think it even has 3d acceleration, im at work without internet connection, but maybe someone can tell me what that is, I think it was fb<something>
-----Mensaje original----- De: pancake [mailto:panc...@youterm.com] Enviado el: viernes, 15 de mayo de 2009 12:07 p.m. Para: dwm mail list Asunto: Re: [dwm] musca wm A friend of me is writing a pkgsystem that builds everything inside a chroot and allows to create a full usable distribution, the pkgsystem itself is not yet finished, but is pretty fast , written in C and shellscript and I really think it is a good project. But actually it is a single-man project. We can use this project as a tool to build the base system. http://repo.or.cz/w/xbps.git/ Actually i'm happy with arch linux, but, i really miss a non-gnu linux and minimalistic distribution. We should get a look on alternatives for glibc (google one? uclibc? ..) but maybe the biggest rock we will face it will be the X server...this is probably one of the interesting projects to work on, but without keeping the X compatibility. (just as an emulation layer) X11 is bloat. (as we have already discussed, we can reuse the drivers of xorg) but designing a better and simpler API. But this is probably a long topic to talk about, and we're of course not the first ones to claim for an X11 replacement. --pancake Benjamin Conner wrote: > > What do you think about creating an offtopic mailing list in > suckless for > > discussing such > > kind of topics, instead of using the dwm@ one like nowadays happen. > I agree with Anselm. I like a lot of your ideas in that message. > "I really miss the conceptual experimentation that dwm was in the > past. But I agree that > we should probably focus on other topics like 'st' or a full OS based > on minimalist software > (based on Linux without GNU craps) ... > " > That's a good idea. Maybe do an lfs. I'd use wmii as the Wm, so you > don't have to recompile. Or maybe have no WM and just X so that you > can put one in yourself and customize it. IDK. > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Leandro Chescotta > <lchesco...@banelco.com.ar <mailto:lchesco...@banelco.com.ar>> wrote: > > 2009/5/15 Anselm R Garbe < garb...@gmail.com > <mailto:garb...@gmail.com> >: > > > I'll provide a new multiscreen support this weekend in dwm. It's > based on assigning specific tags to specific screens. > > I really like the idea > > > La información del presente documento es clasificada como > Confidencial. > > La información del presente documento es clasificada como Confidencial.
