I think we have enough jargon already - too many codes!!

:0(

Tom
GM4FDM

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tony Martin W4FOA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "[DX-Chat]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Zack Widup"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] New "Q" Signal Need


>
>
>
>
> I always use       " QRL ?? " for what it's worth.
>
> 73,DX, Ross K5RH
>
>
>
>
>
>                       "Tony Martin
>                       W4FOA"                   To:      "Zack Widup"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[DX-Chat]"
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                       et>                      cc:
>                       Sent by:                 Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] New
"Q" Signal Need
>                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                       dxa.org
>
>
>                       09/09/2003 10:26
>                       AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes indeed Zack!  I still use the  .. .  and hear it quite often.  Due to
> it's brevity, it is still the best but lacking much international support,
> it doesn't appear to be used much outside the USA.  QRL?  frequently
blocks
> a lot of intelligence whereas the .. .  hardly affects anything.
>
> I say let's encourage .. .
>
> 73
> Tony, W4FOA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zack Widup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[DX-Chat]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] New "Q" Signal Need
>
>
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Larry,  K4WLS wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We CW Ops have needed an appropriate "Q" Signal for
> > > years for "Is the frequency in use ?"
> > >
> >
> > Once upon a time someone tried to popularize the use of "I E" (didit
dit)
> > as an inquiry for "Is the frequency in use?"  Somehow it never caught on
> > like it was intended.  I still use it now and then and I still hear
> others
> > use it occasionally.  It does have the advantage of occupying very
little
> > time and causing very little QRM if the frewuency is in use.
> >
> > 73, Zack W9SZ
> >
> > Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
> > http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
> >
> > To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
> > http://njdxa.org
> >
>
> Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
> http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
>
> To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
> http://njdxa.org
>
>
>
>
> Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
> http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
>
> To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
> http://njdxa.org
>
>
>

Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org

Reply via email to