That may have been true in the distant past, from what I recall from when I was first licensed. I do not believe that to be true today, especially since the implementation of the current DXCC rules (aka "DXCC 2000"), contrary to rumor.
Besides... they can't evaluate "sufficient proof or operation" when none has been submitted, despite repeated requests! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of david miller Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:46 PM To: dx-chat@njdxa.org Subject: [DX-CHAT] 7O and the ARRL The ARRL can be quite vague or to the point when asked what they will accept as sufficient proof of operation and who that proof must come from. It depends on the day of week it seems. W1GDQ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Recharge--play some free games. Win cool prizes too! Play It! Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
