Can't really comment until I read the thing... but this sure sounds like the arguments going on over on QRZ.COM (where you're either against the ARRL, or either naieve or aa shill for them, according to the most vocal posters).
I hope Rich isn't simply rehasing that trash talk. I've always thought better of him. Has anything specific been mentioned, or is it the usual nameless and faceless "ARRL staffers" to blame? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Warren Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 10:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [DX-CHAT] CQ Magazine Editorial Interesting editorial by Rich W2VU on P8 of December CQ Magazine. Topic is Regulation-by-Bandwidth, and the (alleged) way the ARRL Board is using IARU Region II to make a fast end run around U.S. amateurs and the FCC after their first approach drew little support. I find Rich's argument persuasive. Any thoughts, comments - or rebuttal ? John, NT5C. Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, [email protected] This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, [email protected] This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
