Why does this require a MIR? It doesn't seem like there are any packages
depending on it, in any flavour. Whether libappindicator FTBFS or not
has no bearing on this.
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: libayatana-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of DX
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770146
Title:
[MIR] libayatana-appindicator
Status in libayatana-appindicator package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
[Availability]
* Everywhere
[Rationale]
* Appindicator is dead, we should move it to universe and switch to the
"better" and "supported" ayatana version
[Security]
* No security bugs found
[Quality assurance]
* Strongly maintained in Debian, lots of packages in main used to have deltas
to drop and switch to appindicator, I think we will save a lot of work by just
syncing stuff and not maintaining appindicator anymore (at least moving it to
universe)
[Dependencies]
* All deps in main
[Standards compliance]
* New compat level
* Maintained in sync with Debian
* It builds a python2 bind, maybe we can just not MIR all binaries there
[Maintenance]
* Debian maintains it, and is doing a port to ayatana of all packages.
[Background information]
* I think we can also just MIR libayatana-appindicator3-1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libayatana-appindicator/+bug/1770146/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dx-packages
Post to : dx-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dx-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
