thank you for your answer

my transceiver is icom ic 765
computer clone 500mhz

gilles        VE2LX

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mel Martin (VE2DC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'.'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 6:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] icom ct 17 level converter


> Ve21x??? That can't be your call Gilles...
> I'm using version 5.03 with XP without any problem.
> If the system is freezing... What kind of radio are you using?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of .
> Sent: November 15, 2002 2:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Dx4win] icom ct 17 level converter
>
>
> hello to all
>
> I changed from win98 to win xp
>
> on win98 I configured my logbook dx4win on the computer to 9600 baud and
> also on my transceiver icon ic 765
>
> made the same thing with winXP and it unstabilised the program dx4win
> and sometime freeze it
>
> returning to 1200 baud on both side and there is no more problem
>
> I would prefer to use 9600 baud even if in real time it does not make
> much difference
>
>
> ( also )
> I would appreciate to know if the version 5.03 as enough new features
> and worth to buy it because I am returning to psk
>
> ( also )
> for because I had little different problems ( repaired ) with winXP I
> went to dx4win site to download file vishw11.sys (suggested by an
> amateur who e-mailed to me )
> what do I do with it......or where do I copy it I presume...?
>
> wishing to ear soon
>
> gilles   VE2LX
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML or had
> an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. Please post in Plain-Text
> only.--- _______________________________________________
> Dx4win mailing list
> [email protected] http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>
>

Reply via email to