I had the same kind of problem -- appeared to be a 40 meter CW QSO -- couldn't find it and finally gave up - wasn't important enough to spend more time looking for it, and never decided which version was right!
John, K2CIB ----- Original Message ----- From: "D R Hutchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 7:42 PM Subject: [Dx4win] Count anomaly > Whilst checking DXCC Summary status I have discovered a count problem > between v 5.03 and 6.03. > Using the same log, with identical date selection parametrs, the Summary > reports differ by one confirmed QSO, apparently a CW contact. The number of > confirmed CW QSOs is reported to be the same under both versions. > Version 5.03 says 54 worked and 13 confirmed while 6.03 says 55 worked and > 12 confirmed. Even taking things to a band level, 14Mhz is where the problem > seem to lie but again the number of confirmed QSOs is the same on both > versions and the reports begin and end with the same log entries. > Not that it is important at this stage, has anyone else encountered similar > apparent discrepancies and if so what solution was applied? Needless to say > I cannot find the offending QSO. > The Summary numbers are the same in all other respects, just v 5.03 says I > have 1 more confirmed? > > Also noted that a v 5.03 entry MM/PA3GIO (GM), was converted as an error on > 6.03 with a PA prefix. Entry as a new QSO on 6.03 did produce a GM prefix. > > Douglas, GM7SVK > > _______________________________________________ > Dx4win mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win >
