--- Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I upgraded from 6.03 to 6.04 and cannot get out of the demo mode.
> I followed all the upgrade instructions.

Also see my web page for some hints:

  http://www.ad1c.us/dx4win/

73 - Jim AD1C
 

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.ad1c.us
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Apr  4 10:15:47 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Tavan N6XI)
Date: Mon Apr  4 10:17:40 2005
Subject: [Dx4win] Version Upgrade Question
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

After downloading 6.04 and copying my license key, I need to reclaim
preferences settings, report formats and move file data from the 6.03
directory structure. Do I copy the entire SAVE folder or some subset?
Are there files in other folders that need to be copied? Are there
other prudent manual processes needed to fully move from 6.03 to 6.04?
Is this process documented somewhere? (Yes, I've looked. But I may
have missed it.)

73,

/Rick N6XI
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Apr  4 10:18:16 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Mon Apr  4 10:20:03 2005
Subject: [Dx4win] Version Upgrade Question
In-Reply-To: 6667
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- Rick Tavan N6XI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> After downloading 6.04 and copying my license key, I need to reclaim
> preferences settings, report formats and move file data from the 6.03
> directory structure. Do I copy the entire SAVE folder or some subset?
> Are there files in other folders that need to be copied? Are there
> other prudent manual processes needed to fully move from 6.03 to 6.04?
> Is this process documented somewhere? (Yes, I've looked. But I may
> have missed it.)

Hi Rick,

See my web page for upgrade tips:

  http://www.ad1c.us/dx4win/

I believe it answers most of your questions.

73 - Jim AD1C


--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.ad1c.us
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Apr  4 10:38:31 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Mon Apr  4 10:40:27 2005
Subject: [Dx4win] Cook Islands and E5 prefix
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi Folks,

As you can see below, the ITU has assigned the E5 prefix to the Cook Islands
effective July 2004.  I contacted the ARRL DXCC desk today and they intend to
keep using ZK1 as the prefix on the DXCC Awards Credit Listing, so I will NOT
be changing the primary prefix for North or South Cook Islands at this time.  I
will add a prefix mapping of E5 -> ZK1/South.  This will appear in the Release
18 which I expect to have ready in May (I need some time off, and changes have
slowed down):

Here is some more information from the ARRL web site:

  http://www.arrl.org/ 

Cook Islands DXCC status changed (Apr 2, 2005) -- Issuance of a call sign
prefix block for the Cook Islands has made them a DXCC political entity. "It
has come to our attention that the International Telecommunication Union
Table of International Callsign Series now contains an entry for the Cook
Islands," said ARRL Membership Services Manager Wayne Mills, N7NG. "New
Zealand has been issued the E5A-E5Z call sign prefix block for the exclusive
use of the Cook Islands. As a result, the Cooks become a political entity
for DXCC purposes." Mills says the impact on the DXCC List will be minimal,
however. "In reviewing the distances, it appears that the first 'separation'
from the South Cooks likely will be Palmerston Island, which is just over
350 km northwest of Raratonga," he explained. "The remainder of what has
been known as the North Cooks is not sufficiently distant from Palmerston to
become an additional DXCC entity." Mills says the main effect of the change
will be for Palmerston to count for North Cooks instead of South Cooks. The
change also may clarify a situation with the North Cooks. "Since the
addition of the Manihiki Islands (North Cooks) in January 1959 was not based
on a specific distance, Palmerston has counted as South Cooks," he said.
"DXCC Rule 5a comes into play now, keeping both North and South Cooks on the
list, but moving Palmerston to the North Cooks because it is more than 350
km from the South islands and becomes the first separation." Under the
circumstances, Mills said, it might now be appropriate to rename the entity
"Palmerston and the North Cooks."


Note that Palmerston Island has DXCC status similar to Yap Island which
switched from West to East Carolilnes in 1980 (see
http://www.arrl.org/awards/dxcc/notes.html#21):

73 - Jim AD1C

Reply via email to