Hi Jim, AD1C Many thanks for your information. I fully understand it, now. If it worked that way, I'd prefer to make a Submission report to the ARRL DXCC Desk manually, which is based on Logbook reports, as an appreciation to the process of each 2-way 160 QSO that has involved many other factors.
Agn, tnx es 73 de Jo, YC0LOW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jo,YC0LOW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "dx4win Reflector" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 4:56 AM Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Submission vs Logbook File Reports > At 03:21 PM 7/7/2007, Jo,YC0LOW wrote: > >>Tried to generate a 160m (only) DXCC Submission report and it's working >>OK, >>now. But, in the file, some older (and confirmed) QSOs are not listed >>chronologically as they are in the Logbook report. >> >>Instead of putting earlier confirmed station/QSOs dates/years, I wonder >>why >>the software chooses to put different stations -in the same DXCC country- >>in >>a later confirmed QSOs' dates/years for its Submission report? I am using >>v7.03.16 > > DX4WIN always picks the MOST RECENT confirmed QSO to submit. So if you > have AD1C confirmed in 1995 and 2003, it will pick the 2003 QSO. > > 73 - Jim AD1C > > > -- > Jim Reisert AD1C, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.ad1c.us
