I would like to humbly suggest that since logs can be exported, modified, and re-imported, that perhaps something like this would be better for a third-party tool. Just the discussion of defining what a "dupe" is shows to me that implementing such a feature as part of the core functionality of D4W might be difficult. With an external tool, it would be possible for the end-user to specify their particular definition of "dupe" (e.g., within 2 minutes, 1 minute, 5 minutes, same/different digital mode, etc.) without having to build all that logic into D4W.

Just my opinion.
On 1/9/2014 8:39 AM, PY2YP wrote:
You are right Teijo, a dupe definition is mandatory before thinking about removing. A dupe is a nearly exact time, say a 5 minutes window or precisely the same time, resulting either from typing old logs or importing old logs. I have faced this problem several times when working with PY0S old logs. A nice improvement in the "delete dupee" tool should be allowing the user to define the time window. I think several users have faced this problem before.

73 DX de PY2YP - Cesar

On 9/1/2014 10:59, Teijo Murtovaara wrote:
9.1.2014 13:47, Radivoj Kar, F6GNZ kirjoitti:
Cesare,
I think it won't be good to automatically remove dupes from the log!
Better have them marked by a red colour and let user decide afterwards..
73, Radi F6GNZ




Le Jeudi 9 janvier 2014 10h58, PY2YP<py...@py2yp.com>  a écrit :

A tool for removing dupes QSO should be great, say, the dupes QSO should
be saved in a temporary file allowing the user to examine the removed
QSOs before deleting the temp file.
--
73 DX de PY2YP - Cesar


A definition of a dupe would be good.

Does it mean a dupe like in a contest i.e. a separate contact that has
been made on the same band but at a different time?

I think that in this case it is a bad idea to remove the dupes from the
log. The dupe contact might be the only one that is both in your log and
the other stations log. The first occurence might not be in the other
stations log at all for some reason (he/she worked somebody else, had a
computer glitch etc).

On the other hand I have noticed that my log contains some QSOs that are
separated only by seconds. They have resulted by importing the same log
twice into another logging sw that I used before DX4Win. This kind of
contacts I have removed manually which was time consuming.

73 de Teijo OH6NIO
______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


--
73,
        David, K2DBK
        http://k2dbk.blogspot.com
        http://k2dbk.com
        twitter: @k2dbk

______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to