Thanks for the people who responded to my post about filtering EU VHF =
spots.
The cluster I use, K1XX, uses DX Spider.  I found the DX Spider manual
online and am now able to filter out VHF spots not to or from CQ zones =
3,4
or 5 with a few simple commands.

Regarding the incorrect QTH data in the LoTW database, I saw the posting
below on the LoTW reflector the other day.  This person determined that =
1400
or his 4000 LoTW QSLs have bad QTH data (35% error rate, pretty awful).  =
I
have also noticed a lot of similar errors in my own LoTW files (about =
3000
QSLs from the 95,000 QSOs I've uploaded), but haven't tallied the =
figures.

I strongly recommend that DXBase 2005 users NOT use the LoTW ADIF import
feature to update any field other than the LoTW confirmation itself.  =
Doing
so is likely to frequently overwrite good QTH data with bad.

73,
Bill NT1y

-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--

Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 08:05:05 -0500
   From: "FireBrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Confirmed Entities so far

Funny you mention this.
Because just over the weekend I checked my 4k plus LoTW Qsls. Over 1400 =
had
some instance of incorrect data. Usually misspelled counties, incorrect =
ITU
zones. Seems that because when you are entering your data for your =
original
certificate, LoTW asks for ITU zone first and CQ Zone second. I'm pretty
sure that was the way it was. I'm betting that a lot of people may have
missed that and put them in CQ then ITU.

I'm not counting zone discrepancies where a W1 is now living in =
California
etc.

I hope people will check their data and 'Renew' their certificates with =
the
correct info.



Reply via email to