Gary, The error you reference is being generated by Windows, not DXbase. DXbase is merely displaying the error that Windows print mechanism produced. You'll need to search the web for the latest driver for that printer and install it.
I tested the 8160-1Q.lbl label format here and it works just fine as shipped. The reason you are not seeing the via manager info is most likely because you saved the QSO label with a QSL Via entry for bureau instead of one of the other choices. In your log, you'll actually see the entry for Bureau. In the pending label file it would appear as a 0. If it is 0, then no via mgr is produced because you have told DXbase you want it to go by bureau. Regards, Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Senesac AL9A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DXbase Reflector" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 11:45 PM Subject: [Dxbase] Printer problems > Just getting started with DXB2006 upgrade from DXB2003 and having a few > printing problems. The operating system is Windows ME on a Compaq > Presario > laptop. > > 1. My default label printer is an old Canon BJ-200e that 2006 doesn't seem > to want to recognize. Each time I try to print something I get an error > message that, "The printer is not supported by the driver associated with > it. Windows will use Canon Bubble-Jet BJC800 instead." DXB2006 is the > only > software that exhibits this problem. MS Word, Excel, Outlook, and DXB2003 > all recognize the proper driver for this printer and use it without a > problem. Any suggestions? > > 2. I seem to be having the old "via manager" problem as well. My labels > are > Avery 8160 and when using the 8160-1Q.lbl template I cannot get the "via > MGRCALL" part of the label to work. It shows nothing, even though I have > saved a manager callsign for the station worked. The label designer > layout > shows a text block with "via MGRCALL" that has the logic IF CALL <> MGR, > "via "+MGR which appears to be correct. It also has the appearance > condition IF LEN(MGR)>0 set, which was the element missing from my old > 2003 > labels. I don't understand the "via MGRCALL" designation as there is no > variable for MGRCALL. The 2003 label layout used the variable MGR. Is > this > the problem? I'm not terribly comfortable with the label design module to > begin with and the 2006 version appears to be considerably different than > the 2003 edition. > Gary AL9A > > ______________________________________________________________ > Dxbase mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] >
