I should have mention that the operating frequency was 6 meters and
I had QSOs at different intervals, ie, 50.130, 50.150, 50.175 etc.
Last night I open the DX Lab programs which is used with two monitors.
I then open DX Atlas in monitor two. Entered a few contacts, 6M, using
WinWarbler which is on monitor one. All QSOs were put into DXKeeper,
which is on monitor two, with the correct frequency.
=================================
Ran into a strange problem last night (last Thursday now). I had
monitor
1 set to DXBase 2005 and Monitor 2 to DX Atlas 2.25. After I had logged
serval QSOs, I happen to look at the frequency that was logged. All QSOs
were 363416.56 and the band was 75. I closed DX Atlas and the frequencies
would be logged OK. Open DX Atlas back up and got the same problem.
Anyone have this happen to them and if so, what's the cure. Using 2.4 MHz
and XP pro. Rig is an IC-756 pro.
JV
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 28 10:30:33 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack)
Date: Sat May 28 10:41:48 2005
Subject: [Dxbase] dxcc worksheet?
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ron et.al.,
Lot of discussion here yesterday about DXCC submission forms.. hihi.... We
have ran exhaustive tests on this last night and this am. In no case were
we able to find that DXbase did not select the necessary and correct QSOs.
I think there is confusion about what the valid award categories mean with
respect to the ARRL DXCC Award rules.
The mode awards, these are the Phone, RTTY, and CW awards mean that ANY QSO
regardless of what band is involved is eligible ( for simplicity ignore the
date of the QSO ).
The band awards, these are the individual band categories, mean that ANY QSO
on that band is eligible, regardless of the mode.
When a QSO is submitted to ARRL, ALL award categories for which that QSO
might apply are taken into account. So, one QSO could be used for more than
one category such as a 20m CW QSO would apply toward the CW award and also
the 20M award.
Based on the collective comments, what some folks seem to think is that
there is an award for each band AND mode when in fact there is not. Because
of this erroneous thinking, there is a perception that some QSOs should be
selected when in fact, they are not eligible.
Take for example the following log:
8P6IM CW 10m
8P9HT CW 12m
8P0A USB 15m
8P2K RTTY 15
8P6JG CW 20m
8P9HT CW 30m
8P9GQ CW 40m
8P9FD CW 80m
8P6JB USB 20m
8P6KY LSB 80m
Now let's say we run a DXCC award and we select all the categories and
bands. Some folks would believe that every one of these QSOs should appear
on the award form. That would be incorrect. The last two QSOs do NOT
qualify because the category of award has already been covered by one of the
previously selected QSOs.
8P6JB does not qualify because 8P has already been covered for phone by 8P0A
and 20m has already been covered by 8P6JG. Similarly, 8P6KY does NOT
qualify because 8P has already been covered by 8P0A for phone and 8P6FD for
80m.
It would be impossible for us to investigate each individual's database in
order to find the explanation for why something isn't on the form. As some
have already stated, the DXCC award criteria is very complex. Depending on
the person's log, it could take hours to sort through all this. But, for
anyone who thinks something is missing, all you have to do is list every QSO
for that country and apply the same thinking as we have just explained. I
feel confident you will eventually find that some other QSO has already met
the criteria that caused you to think that a particular QSO was missing.
Hope this helps,
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Stordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alfred LaVallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Dxbase] dxcc worksheet?
> Fred et al:
>
> I am currently working on a rather large DXCC submission. I worked FT5XO
> Kerguelen on 11 band modes in their recent DXPedition and received the
> paper cards for all my Q's.. Prior to this I did not have Kerguelen in my
> log.
>
> On the DXCC Award Submission window in DXBase2006 I have selected
> everything (Mixed, Phone CW, RTTY, Digital and all bands except 6 and 2
> meters.). For Select Records From I have selected QSO log and Cards Only.
> I have not selected SAT, QRP, YL, User-1 nor User-2. My additional
> selections are Exclude Past Submission, Select only Valid for Field Check
> and Combine RTTY and Digital. I have also selected a date of 19950101
> since I am preparing this submission for Field Checking.
>
> Doing so I find that these two Q's for which I have cards: FT5XO on 40
> phone and 30 RTTY are not selected. The rest of FT5XO Q's are selected. I
> would have never have noticed this except I am rather proud of getting
> country number 320 with 11 band modes so I was rather alert to this one!
> And it's also fresh in my mind.
>
> I have checked the log for these two Q's and they are all shown with the
> correct dates (March 2005), and in other respects do not differ from the
> selected ones except for the band and mode of course.
>
> It seems to me that they should have been selected, however reading the
> ARRL DXCC rules it is clear that the rules are unclear!
>
> If someone who really understands the DXCC rules can comment..is it
> possible that since 20 phone and 40 cw were selected that 40 phone would
> not be of any DXCC value? Similarly since 40 rtty and 30 cw were selected
> would 30 rtty not be of any DXCC value? That might explain it, otherwise I
> am in the dark as to why these two were not selected.
>
> Ron, N5IN
>
>
> Alfred LaVallee wrote:
>
>>Here is my 2 cents worth on the same problem. I've been sitting on the
>>sidelines, but have had the same problem since I started using DXBase
>>several versions ago. It is rather difficult to explain details without
>>being longwinded, but here goes.
>>>From the dropdown menu: output, awards, DXCC; I check ALL modes & all
>>>bands
>>desired, QSO log & cards only, exclude past submissions & combine RTTY &
>>Digital. I believe that SHOULD give me my complete submission. I found
>>no
>>errors, but did have some QSLs that were not selected for submission.
>>There
>>were 3 RTTY QSO missing from the report (calls or prefixes don't matter).
>>Using the summary window it was easy to verify that each was applied to
>>the
>>right prefix, confirmed, and none were already credited for DXCC.
>>
>>After accepting that report (marking all QSOs credited) the same procedure
>>produced no new QSOs to be credited.
>>Starting over again; from the dropdown menu: output, awards, DXCC; I
>>unchecked all bands and modes EXCEPT RTTY and this produces the QSOs that
>>were originally omitted. I now have two reports to combine for one
>>submission.
>>
>>Had I not keep good records (DXbase of course) and put the QSLs aside, I
>>would not have even known they were omitted. It has been complained about
>>before by others, but seems to have just been shrugged off as operator
>>error.
>>
>>73, Fred
>>K1ACL
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "George Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "TOM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:02 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Dxbase] dxcc worksheet?
>>
>>
>>
>>>Tom,
>>>It's a little hard to tell from your notes exactly what is or is not
>>>being
>>>
>>
>>
>>>included. Maybe a specific callsign example would help.
>>>
>>>I use the DXCC function here and it seems OK in 2006.
>>>
>>>For the case you mention as QSLs you know should be listed but are not, a
>>>couple quick "reasons" come to mind:
>>>1. The country (log column labeled prefix) of these "QSLs" has already
>>>been recognized by DXBase as being credited for DXCC.
>>>2. The actual QSO you want does not indicate that a QSL has been
>>>received.
>>>
>>>There are several more possibilities as part of the selection logic etc
>>>but it sounds like you may have already addressed those.
>>>You can check item 1 above by running the report: Output / Standard
>>>Reports . Look in User Designed other DXCC Related list for the report
>>>dxcccredselect.rpt. If you run this report you will see everything
>>>DXBase
>>>
>>
>>
>>>"thinks" has been credited.
>>>Hope this helps but maybe a little more info from you could pin point the
>>>direction too.
>>>73, George .. W1ZT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>At 07:17 PM 5/25/2005, TOM wrote:
>>>
>>>>IS anyone out there experiencing problems with the DXCC Worksheet report
>>>>for submission to ARRL as i am? i have spent about 3 weeks off and on
>>>>trying to get this report correct for field checking and have had
>>>>numerous
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>problems getting it right? I havn't seen many posts on it except for
>>>>multiple q's which i figured out, but my problem is it listing q's
>>>>already
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>credited and not listing ones that should be listed for submission? I
>>>>have
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>gotten it down 2 two qsls i need to submit and have listed on report but
>>>>for some reason Dxbase 2006 will not recognize them not matter what i
>>>>try checking or unchecking in the awards field or select field? any help
>>>>would
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>be appreciated here? one final note i have always done this by long hand
>>>>method up to know so this may be part of my problem but don't have a
>>>>clue how to correct it? TNX.....AA1BQ...TOM
>>>>______________________________________________________________
>>>>Dxbase mailing list
>>>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
>>>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>______________________________________________________________
>>Dxbase mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Dxbase mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>
