Wes and George, Wes is correct .. the COMBIT variety of Lists and Labels has the "right mouse-click" to change the printer .. But, regretfully, within Seagate Crystal Reports (our Standard style of Reports - *.rpt) there is "nothing" to give us that option.
So, in the case of the Standard Reports - you would have to change the default printer within the Control Panel .. no other option here. 73 Joe wa6axe Wes N7WS wrote: > I'm still using DXBase 2005, which does everything I need, so maybe I'm > off-base here but... > > User defined lists and labels have the select (change) printer option > available via the right click method. Built-in (standard) reports, even > the "user-designed" one do not have the option. > > Lists have a .lst file extension, reports have a .rpt extension. Again > I may be wrong, but I think that the only way to edit .rpt's to maybe > fix this is by using Crystal reports. Joe should jump in here. > > Wes N7WS > > George Harlem W1EBI wrote: > >> Tried that first, Gary, but it did not change the printer selection for >> printing a report. Selecting another printer as default printer in >> Control >> Panel does it, but that is simply more work than necessary. If the label >> process can select a network printer, the report process should be >> able to >> do the same. >> >> 73, George W1EBI >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gary AL9A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January >> 24, 2008 5:37 PM >> To: George Harlem W1EBI; 'DXBase Reflector' >> Subject: Re: [Dxbase] Printer selection >> >> Have you tried File/Print Setup... I beileve that is where you define >> your default printer for DXB. To use a different printer go back and >> redefine a new default under File/Print Setup... >> >> 73, >> Gary AL9A >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Harlem W1EBI" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "'DXBase Reflector'" <[email protected]> >> Sent: January 24, 2008 7:44 AM >> Subject: [Dxbase] Printer selection >> >> >> >> >>> This may have shown up on other "wish lists" (maybe even my own), but >>> for >>> the next release of DXbase I would be quite pleased with a new feature >>> allowing a report to print on another printer via a right-click of the >>> printer icon. I don't recall when or how I managed to set up the >>> default >>> printer, but I can't seem to find any way to change to any different >>> printer, forcing me to print only on that printer. >>> >>> George W1EBI >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Dxbase mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Dxbase mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Dxbase mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 26 12:44:01 2008 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Greene) Date: Sat Jan 26 12:46:57 2008 Subject: [Dxbase] Update to the LoTW Stats by Year report is now posted - Joe wa6axe In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Having recently uploaded all my QSO records to LoTW, and downloaded the QSL Report I wanted to update my DXB2007 data with the confirmed information. When I run the ADIF LoTW import in the test mode, it shows that many of the VE's have a "State" information warning and many of the US records have a "County" warning. Is this correct? I would presume the data coming from ARRL's LoTW ADIF file would be the correct ADIF format? Is this an ADIF ver 1 spec vs. ver 2 spec problem? Should I ignore it even though it would be nice to have the County info recorded. Thanks, Rod w7zrc > On 1/15/08, Joseph Glockner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To all: > > > > For those who downloaded the LoTW Stats by Year report, > > I have posted an updated version that corrects the > > "Division by Zero" error that some users are seeing. > > > > The updated version is at: > > > > http://www.navycthistory.com/wa6axe/lotwstatsbyyear.zip > > <http://www.navycthistory.com/wa6axe/lotwstatsbyyear.zip> > > > > FYI - this report is looking at the QSLS column of your > > DXbase logbook (to see whether the QSOs was "sent" to > > LoTW) - and - is also looking at the CFM column (to > > see whether the QSOs was "confirmed" via LoTW). > > > > If you do not have the QSLS column or CFM column of > > your logbook indicating the LoTW actions - then this > > report will not be useful to you. > > > > > > 73 Joe wa6axe > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Dxbase mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > > > > > -- > Rod Greene, W7ZRC > 3560 N. McDermott Rd. > Meridian ID 83642 -- Rod Greene, W7ZRC 3560 N. McDermott Rd. Meridian ID 83642 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 26 12:48:41 2008 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Giuseppe1) Date: Sat Jan 26 12:51:32 2008 Subject: [Dxbase] Help please In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (added by [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Hallo Friend, there it is an EASY way to completely dElete ALL qso on my log (abt 50.000 qsos)? Thanks for help..... 73 de Gius, IT9VDQ -- Io utilizzo la versione gratuita di SPAMfighter per utenti privati. Sino ad ora ha rimosso 889 mail spam. Gli utenti paganti non hanno questo messaggio nelle loro email . Prova gratuitamente SPAMfighter qui:http://www.spamfighter.com/lit
