Allan, I have been using DXBase for more years than I care to think about; and I have to say that the program right now does all (and a lot more) than I need. It generates more reports than I could ever use (I only generate one, and that is QSLNOREC).
You specifically mentioned LOTW, and it does that now; I upload quite often and find it very easy to do. I don't use eQSL so I can't comment on that. I am wondering exactly how it would work with online logs? Right now I go to the web and see if I am in the log. I have looked at other logging programs the last couple of years to see what they offer; and I have to say none match my needs better than DXBase; but I have a very "narrow" interest in only working CW, SSB and RTTY for DXCC submission and credits. And as long as it does that, interfaces with my Orion 2, prints labels, and has two rotor interfaces, there is not anything major that I can see to improve on. All said, I am sure there are certain upgrades that would be benefical to some users; the only question that Jack needs to ask is how much ROI will he generate from such upgrades. And like you, I would certainly like to see Jack at Dayton again; if not just to show that he is still supporting and taking an interest in DXBase. As I am sure you know, a little "face time" can go a long way; and it certainly gives the progarm users a chance to provide meaningful input in a "one on one" atmosphere. That said, I know Jack still takes an active interest in his product. I was having a problem (and I found out a few others too) for a couple of years with the rotor 2 not responding after closing and then opening DXBase. I brought it to Jack's attention and he was able to diagnose the problem and send the apporpriate fix. Dick K8ZTT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Meredith, Allan" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 11:02 PM Subject: [Dxbase] To be or not to be? > Hi All > > Heading up to Dayton 2009 and still no word on Jack doing anything? I > personally would at least like Jack to do the right thing by his loyal > customers and advise if no further development is going to be done on > DXBase. Then decisions could be made as to whether we take the leap to > move to a supported product (even though I would very much prefer not > to!). Things like LoTW, online logs, eQSL, new modes, integration with > other programs etc etc (the list goes on....) that really demands that we > continue to have a logbook that is evolving. Changing after all these > years is not an easy thing to contemplate but for the reasons I listed it > will eventually become a necessity if I (and most electronic loggers) want > to keep up. Joe does a fantastic job of trying to keep the DXBase ship > afloat but a lone hand cannot save the day. Please Jack...... a simple > yes or no is no less than your customers deserve. Thank you. > > Cheers....Allan VK2CA > > ********************************************************************** > This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain > privileged information or confidential information or both. If you > are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender. > ********************************************************************** > ______________________________________________________________ > Dxbase mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Dxbase mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
