Carsten: Yes, that PJ5/K1XM QSO and the LOTW entry would be valid for the/*OLD*/ PJ5.
The problem, at least as I see it, is that the Updater shows that contact confirms the/*NEW*/ PJ5. I think Neal understands; take a look at his reply to my post. 73, Al, K6RIM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PJ5/K1XM on 10/10/10 at /*0253Z*/ QSO should still count "for the old entity" St. Euthatius and a LOTW entry would be valid. Hw? 73ss Carsten, DL6LAU ______________________________________________________________ Dxbase mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
