First of all, sorry for having sent a message without renaming the subject
line. My fault.
Second, It seems, by his reaction, I completely misunderstood what Pascal
meant with his Javascipt Extension File. As I come back to his original
post (took me some time to jump over all this unecessary Flash vs DynAPI),
it writes:
"So basically we can put all the non dynapi related stuff in that file. The
file name says it all, simply javascript extensions that should have been
available in the official ECMA docs :) This way we can create all the code
and other "systems" using the only include line for the jsextend.js file..
All other source files are then linked in using the global function
include()."
That's why I thought that was intended to also put in all the stuff that
might be necessary in a project, but not directly related to the DynAPI.
For me, the fact that in IE push and pop and splice etc are just not
available is a problem. So I thought that it could just be included, ONLY
IF NEEDED by someone, for a particular project. That's why I included in
the comment the dependencies. It seems that I had a different vision than
Pascal had.
HOWEVER, I still I'm OK with what Pascal proposed (examples are given in
his post, just after the few lines I pasted above), making include()
function, etc...
I'l try to maintain the web page (or split them a little bit) I mentionned
with some handy stuff that might be sometimes helpful, only if people here
show some interest for it (Sorry, I can't make it a complete project and
name it "JsAPI"n no time for that).
BTW, I use mostly IE5 (the one shipped with W2K, without any patch, welcome
crackers !), and there is none of the push, pop, splice, etc methods. From
what I read on the list, only people with IE4 should miss them. Does
someone have a table with what is missing and where.
Sorry for the trouble I might have caused
Sincerely
Marc
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
