i wouldn't really be too interested in using code from a site that doesn't support
NS4. he says that his code is perfectly valid but the browser doesn't render it
correctly.
isn't there something about a bad workman and blaming his tools?
Scott Andrew LePera wrote:
> Mike Hall also has something called the "JavaScript Crunchinator" which
> may be of use.
> http://www.brainjar.com
>
> scottandrew
>
> Marc van Leeuwen wrote:
> >
> > As jspack seems to, for what I have read, have too many bugs to be useful,
> > and as nobody has the experience||time||will to write a js parser to make
> > the comments (and newlines and unneeded spaces and tabs) go to /dev/null to
> > make a release version, I was just thinking about what already exists that
> > parses Javascript, and that has source code available without a too
> > restrictive licence. The answer I found is.... Mozilla !
> > Maybe it is a way to go after mozilla sources and to see if the Javascript
> > part is "extractable" to make it a parser able to do what jspack is
> > intended for. Maybe some Mozilla contibutors/developpers are willing to help.
> > If nobody has checked this, I'll see by myself...later
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
--
Michael Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12107010
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
