Well, I'll take it that the silence is an indicating factor that we're not so sure we want to move on to new branch (2.9) or the new website, correct?
-- Raymond Irving --- Raymond Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I'm wondering if this is the way we treat open > source > projects? > > For some months now I've heard of plans to improve > or > branch dynapi 3.0, but up to now I've not seen any > changes or have heard any talks leading up to such > change. > > Not because it's OPEN SOURCE we should just leave > things like that! Many hands help to make work > lighter! IMO DynAPI is a project and has a bright > future (regardless of what others think about DOM > browers - even "DOM Compatibile Browsers" have > cross-browser problem!) > > Can't we at least spend one hour a week to work on > the > dynapi project? > > Jordi -- > > what's up with the status on the dynapi 2.9 cvs > branch > and the new dynapi website? > > I thinks it's time we start moving this project > forward. > > Do you agree? > > -- > Raymond Irving > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
