Re: [Dynapi-Dev] No comments? No Votes?

[Doug Melvin]

Regardless of naming convention, I intend to only produce light widgets at first. This will allow a larger number of widgets to be completed and realeases (and tested) in as short a time as possable. ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Melvin To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 6:20 PM Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] No comments? No Votes? Lacking a response I will work on a scroll pane light. Features will include: Overloaded setHTML and addChild (too sethtml or add children directly to the display area) Overloaded setSize function to automatically scale the scroll knobs (if the option is set)     I would like feedback on nameing conventions of gui components as it is soon enough to change what I'm using: Option A) which I am currently using 1) Widget_light : a widghet which is a light-weight as possable 2) WIdget : a widget wich is a little more heavy, has images/skinnable 3) Widget_advanced: a widget with added features not normally required     I.E. -an autoscroll feature (when the mouse is simply over the button, invoke the scrolling)           -a continuous scroll feature where the scroll keeps going while you hold mousebutton down on the scrol button   Otion b) 1) Widget : a widget which is a light-weight as possable (default) 2) Wiget_skinned : a widget wich is a little more heavy, has images/skinnable 3) Widget_advanced: a widget with added features not normally required     I.E. -an autoscroll feature (when the mouse is simply over the button, invoke the scrolling)           -a continuous scroll feature where the scroll keeps going while you hold mousebutton down on the scrol button   ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Melvin To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 6:09 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] No comments? No Votes? <tap tap tap> is this thing on?