the DynObject is one of those things I just added to my own distribution
(only since the last release). I also believe it should be in the official
distro, but it requires some work and then testing to see if everything is
modified correctly (as I have done with my own code.. which took quite some
time :)
Ofcourse it's easier now that I know where the important problems can occur,
but I think we should focus on getting the current release out.. and then
implement that idea (if the other dev's agree).
cya,
Pascal Bestebroer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dynamic-core.net
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Jared Nuzzolillo
> Verzonden: donderdag 11 januari 2001 17:10
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] new f.a.q.
>
>
> maybe I missed this in the last 400 mails, and I'm sure its been properly
> discussed, but can someone fill me in on why we are not using the
> Dynobject
> scheme Pascal came up with. What is the benefit of not doing it that way?
> I've really been trying hard to go through the code and get a
> better idea on
> how it all works, and it just seems that pascal's technique makes more
> sense...
>
> -jaredn
>
> btw, this crashes netscape 6 for some reason...i wonder why:
>
> gd=document.getElementById
> t=gd("a_valid_divs_id")
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dynapi-dev
