Hold on there, ... take care with the terms you use ! That's not how I understood it : the OO philosophy embraces both class-based (CO) and prototype-based (PO) objects. It's not OO versus CO, it's CO versus PO ! And if I read the specs correctly, JS is supposed to be a prototype-based language, not a class-based language. CU, Dann Eytan Heidingsfeld wrote: > OO in JS or ECMA script is documented. If you read carefully you will notice > that JS was designed as a Class Oriented language that is basically the same > as OO (Objects and Classes are basically the same). The only difference > between OO and CO is the way it does inheritance hence my new inherit > function. > > About the NS6 I think that can be worked on at the same time while the NG is > being worked on. One of the reasons of designing the NG like this is so that > we can update the Core of DynAPI without having to change everything just > one file (dynlayer.js). > 8an > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
begin:vcard n:Martens;Danny tel;cell:+32(0)478.544.003 tel;fax:+32(0)2.706.52.01 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.tomoton.com org:Tomoton adr:;;Geldenaaksebaan 185/2;Heverlee;;B-3001;Belgium version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fn:Danny Martens end:vcard
