Doesn't thread just use setTimeout anyway?
Richard Bennett wrote:
> That looks very nice, you don't happen to have some examples of this I could
> put up?
> just one thing, it would be even better (I think) if it used thread.js
> instead of setInterval, to balance out processor use. (or am I wrong on
> that?)
>
> Cheers,
> Richard Bennett
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.richardinfo.com
> (Everything running on, and ported to the 19/12/2000 snapshot of DynAPI2)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 2:24 PM
> Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] opacity extension for DynAPI (following up on Netscape
> 6 discussi on)
>
> > Silly me,
> >
> > sorry about that sent the message before I attched the zip file.
> >
> > la prisa mata (haste kills)
> >
> >
> > <<opacity.zip>>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
--
Michael Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12107010
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
