cool. haven't had much of a chance to play with the intervals yet. thanks for
the info.
Jordi \"ilMaestro\" Ministral wrote:
> I've tested, and it is far more efficient to have one single interval.
> Moverover, my tests showed that NS will fail miserably to render any of the
> animated layers when there's, say, about 50 setIntervals moving different
> layers, whereas having one interval move 100 layers performed smoothly.
>
> Richard Bennett wrote:
>
> > I haven't tested whether
> > thread running 100 animations is more efficient than 100 animations using
> > their own setTimeout, but I would expect so.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Richard Bennett
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
--
Michael Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12107010
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
