do you mean dynlayer+dyndocument both inheriting from dynobject?
Pascal wrote:
> I already did some of these split ups in dynacore.. and it works ok, but is
> not such a big speed increase (maybe a small increase when creating many
> layers at initialisation)
>
> I split up things like sethtml, setx+sety, so you might want to look at that
> before having to code it yourself :)
>
> I want to introduce all those changes to DynAPI aswell, but I think we
> should first make sure NS6 works correctl aswell (not sure how many problems
> there still are though).
>
> If you and Robert find it ok (main developers) I will try to include these
> optimisations, and also add the dyndocument idea (dynlayer+dyndocument both
> inheriting from dyndocument)
>
> cya,
>
> Pascal Bestebroer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Software ontwikkelaar
> Oberon Informatiesystemen b.v.
> http://www.oibv.com
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Jordi -
> > IlMaestro
> > - Ministral
> > Verzonden: vrijdag 16 februari 2001 14:21
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] TCanvas vs. DynLayer
> >
> >
> > Speed optimization can always be introduced. In fact, the
> > latest precreation
> > code that caused some old bugs to reappear and some people to
> > complain about the
> > API going backwards was introduced in order to speed up layer
> > creation,
> > something that was not a problem until people started wanting
> > hundreds, even
> > thousands of layers onscreen.
> >
> > I've been tempted to suggest this many times but I didn't
> > want to spawn another
> > "code split-up" argument. Some critical methods like, say,
> > moveTo or setSize
> > might speed up by doing.:
> >
> > if(is.ns) DynLayer.prototype.moveTo = function A
> > else DynLayer.prototype.moveTo = function B
> >
> > I'll try myself in see what happens
> >
> > Pascal wrote:
> >
> > > me again :)
> > >
> > > I don't think this test is really useable.
> > > Your current Tcanvas code misses ALOT of things DynLayer
> > takes care of.
> > >
> > > DynLayer sets sizes, z-index,clipping,bgimages in
> > initialisation (and also a
> > > few other style properties.. note that setting a style
> > property is what
> > > slows everything down) I once did some optimization tricks
> > to the dynlayer,
> > > by removing sizes/clipping etc.. this speeds up things BIG
> > TIME, but also
> > > brakes useability for a large amount of widgets, and is
> > less flexible.
> > >
> > > DynLayer has code included for fast child-creation.. even
> > though there are
> > > no child layers in your test, this code is still called
> > (function calls).
> > > This could be made faster in dynlayer, but for now is more
> > readable for
> > > developers. Do another test with layers containing a large
> > amount child
> > > layers.. Dynlayer's precreation will probably be faster.
> > >
> > > shreded enough? ;)
> > >
> > > Pascal Bestebroer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > Software ontwikkelaar
> > > Oberon Informatiesystemen b.v.
> > > http://www.oibv.com
> > >
> > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Eytan
> > > > Heidingsfeld
> > > > Verzonden: vrijdag 16 februari 2001 13:19
> > > > Aan: Dynapi-Dev
> > > > Onderwerp: [Dynapi-Dev] TCanvas vs. DynLayer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'd love to test performance one against the other. The only
> > > > test I did was
> > > > create 100 layers and check the times. In IE TCanvas was 200
> > > > ms faster and
> > > > in NS it was 1300(canvas) to 10000(dynlayer).
> > > >
> > > > I'd love you guys to start tearing my canvas to shreds.
> > > >
> > > > Included in the zip are:
> > > > tcanvas.js
> > > > browser.js
> > > >
> > > > they need to be included in the document(working on
> > adding .include)
> > > >
> > > > 8an
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
--
Michael Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12107010
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
