Well, I learned disillusionment from a master. I remember a certain
disillusioned Pascal that went off to create Dynacore. Your still here.
I'm not going anywhere. And a lot of the passion that drove you to leave and
get it "done" proved right in the end.
Everything is a journey. I just want to kick a rock and start a new path in
motion. The bricks of this API are the building blocks and it's a bit
premature to discuss architectual relevance at this point (this is a
metaphor Richard).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 3:04 AM
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Freeing Memory
> Ok, it then seems I misunderstood the complete discussion.. but I don't
> think everyone was on the same thinking-plane as Robert is, and some other
> people (the few that actually reacted) might have thought the same way I
> have: the plan of creating a new API from the ground up.
>
> This is something I don't think has any potential what so ever (just
> restating my point here) for the reasons I posted in the other mail.
>
> I'm all for cleaning up the current code, but not for changing things
around
> "hoping" it will end up faster and lighter (I strongly believe it won't)
>
> To reply to Raymond's disullisioned problem quote:
>
> "To be honest I was a little disillusioned with the overall response to
what
> I was proposing. And I'm certainly not interested in expending a large
> amount of my time for nothing."
>
> That's just part of my problem as well.. people seem to like discussing
> things (I'm one of them) but almost nothing is being done! This is what I
> see as the biggest problem with the DynAPI2. I have now read numerous
posts
> of people saying that they fixed bugs, created great add-ons.. great, BUT
> SHOW US. don't tell us you did it, and it works, and it's better..give
it
> up! (read the LICENSE agreement).
>
> Everyone saying that the current API could be improved alot is correct,
but
> not for the reasons they give, but for the fact that if everyone would
start
> sharing there work more it would have grown faster.
>
> Ofcourse, Raymond, your ideas are great and planning things is fine (as
long
> as we're planning the enhancement and continueation of THIS api).. but if
> planning is all that's being done by people, then I'd rather not
> participate...and I fear that that's the case (as usual)
>
>
> "<emotes> flips blow torch in the air and extends the hand towards the
rest
> of you all."
>
> lets see who will reach towards it then, just don't get disillusioned
> again...
>
>
> Pascal Bestebroer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Software ontwikkelaar
> Oberon Informatiesystemen b.v.
> http://www.oibv.com
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Jordi -
> > IlMaestro
> > - Ministral
> > Verzonden: woensdag 21 februari 2001 10:25
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Freeing Memory
> >
> >
> > Amen. However Pascal I don't think anyone pretends to redo
> > the API. We should
> > blame Raymond ( as usual :) ) because he introduced the 3 in
> > the name and made
> > it all look scary.
> >
> > When we're saying DynAPI3 I understand we're meaning DynAPI2
> > with better and
> > cleaner code, not a new API.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
