My post was a quote from O'Rielly's. Also, I am gathering all the data I
can find that might be pertinent to finding what works.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Emberson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Continuing Freeing memory
> Raymond Smith wrote:
>
> > Sounds like we need a "null cycle killer". Damn sure circular
references a
> > playing a big roll in our leak...
> >
>
> A good, modern gc collects cycles. The Boehm gc does and so does java's. I
> assume
> M$ uses similar technology. Don't know what NS does. All
> memory allocated is kept track of. Starting from a set of "well known
objects"
> (top
> level objects) one sweeps marking all reachable objects (and not
traversing
> objects
> more than once). Then all objects that have not been marked are collected.
> Cycles are NOT a problem.
>
> Richard Emberson
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
