> > "Note that delete affects only property values, not objects
> > referred to by those
> > properties"
>
> > >From this can we establish that we cannot rely on delete to
> > free memory reliably ???
> > Does this also mean that we'd have to iterate through
> > sub-objects deleting them? Perhaps
> > some kind of destroy() method ???
>
> hmm, it would then be possible to atleast delete all objects created
within
> the DynLayer (simple for loop can be used) problematic thing are all
> objects with objects them selves..
>
> the deletefromparent method could do this for us, take care of deletion of
> all objects referred to. I'll see if I can come up with anything.. and if
it
> actually frees any memory at all.
a recursive funtion maybe?
'psudo code'
function delete_children(obj){
for each child in obj.children[] {
delete_children(child)
}
delete obj
}
this would delete all children of all children of all children.. ect
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG Free Edition
Download at: http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.cfm
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.231 / Virus Database: 112 - Release Date: 2/12/01
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
