Erik Arvidsson wrote:
> 
> What made you think that MS has a JIT for JScript? Personally I thought this
> was one of the good news about .Net and JScript.Net. (Getting the same
> performance as from all other languages.)
>
> IE3+ has been using MS JVM which uses JIT but this does not mean that
> JScript benefits from this?
>
> Any proof / hints really apreciated. Same goes for Netscape Navigator 4 and
> Mozilla 5.
> 
        As I said to Jeff, I will check source code for the JS1.5 C source-code
implementation to see how it works internally. If this, the last version
for NS browsers, doesn't do any JIT, surely previous versions didn't
too. About IE, I will check again when I have access to an IE4+ equipped
box. At home I still have IE3, but for no use at all, and it doesn't do
JIT for JavaScript, but for Java ... but who knows what does MS call
"Java"?... BTW, IE3 is still faster at JavaScript (JScript in MS
notation) than NS3+.

        Raides J.


_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev

Reply via email to