jspack is a lisp script. there should be no problem not removing newlines.
As for http://, this can be avoided by checking for "http:" before the
"//"... Unfortunately I'm not that fluent in Lisp, but if this is such a big
deal I can write a C++ program that does the same...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cameron Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:31 AM
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] SSL error for IE 5.5


>
>
> The compression program we use wouldn't have a problem except that it
> removes new lines, and not everyone is in the habit of putting semicolons
> at
> the end of a line. However if we told it not to remove newlines, then we
> could use it.
>
> I actually found a problem with just removing all one line comments if you
> happen to have a URL somewhere in your code, e.g.
> http://dynapi.sourceforge.net suddenly becomes http:
>
> The DynAPI fortunately doesn't have anything like the above in it (so
far).
>
> The only foolproof solution would be to rewrite a compiler that parses the
> code correctly and rewrites it the way we want, without comments, and
> without newlines. This is not an easy task...
>
> Any computer science students out there with an LALR grammar for
Javascript
> and a desire to write a parser?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel
> > Holmen
> > Sent: 30 March 2001 21:08
> > To: DynAPI-Dev list
> > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] SSL error for IE 5.5
> >
> >
> > What if everyone adds their comments as one-line comments (//). These
are
> > easy to strip without any fuzz.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cameron Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:22 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] SSL error for IE 5.5
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > It was a workaround for a problem where IE did not receive
> > events in empty
> > > layers. So as long as you don't want to catch events on empty layers
> you
> > > can
> > > remove it.
> > >
> > > As for the commments, there was talk of having a fully
> > commented version,
> > > and a compressed version. But the compressor (jspack) was pretty
fussy,
> > and
> > > with all the different coding styles of the contributors to
> > this project,
> > > it
> > > didn't work very well. So I think we are back to very few
> > comments again.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev



_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev

Reply via email to