There are already some needs for code other than JS. I believe that we should work on
an official server side set of code such as the remote server security work around.
i also think that we should be making room for users to but their own code in their
setup without the need for confusing the file layout. I see no point in mixing the
official images in with the JS code.
Robert Rainwater wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Since there aren't other components in the official distro other than
> js, I'm not sure what use this would be. I understand how it could be
> beneficial, but I just don't see why we need it for the DynAPI.
>
> - --
> Robert Rainwater
>
> On 4/26/2001, 5:21:11 PM EST, Michael wrote about "[Dynapi-Dev] New File Sturcture":
>
> > I did something similar in my work-version and i think it's definitely a
> > good idea to structure things like this.
> > and as long as the structure inside the dynapi-folder doesn't change there
> > aren't many things to change.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAjrolGwACgkQTn30a43L7D8+UQCghF5M8qqOD5/efDrKZbENoJ9d
> 2HsAoLHi6O+wN5B4wUu7sGR8IQ12bAq5
> =yssi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
--
Michael Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12107010
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
