I fully agree with the splitting of the project, I see no problem with having
the extensions built separately, I do however believe that the API should be
built with extensions in mind.
In my current structure, the type of language matches the file extension and
directory. this would mean that with the simple chaning of a single variable,
the user can alter the type of sever language to meet their server specs without
the need for altering every reference.
The limited scope of the API is one of the reasons that I built my own
distribution. If someone has an ASP version of my PHP code that outputs the
required data in the require format, then it should be added. What we need to
agree on is the specs of the content without arguing over which language is in
use.
--
Michael Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12107010
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
