Robert Rainwater wrote:
> Thats not really a good idea, because none has no real value. So you
> are assigning undefined as a background image. Sure it may work, but
I would argue
> that the real image solution is cleaner.
"none" actually is a proper value, but it should be expressed this way:
{background-image: none}
...without the "url()" enclosing it.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/colors.html#background-properties
I like this approach myself, as it doesn't require an actual image to be
requested.
My $0.02
scottandrew
--
scott andrew lepera
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web stuff: www.scottandrew.com
music stuff: www.walkingbirds.com
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
