Agreed. Not only that but, why in hells name would we want to change the implementation of a function? For gramerrical reasons? This isn't english 101.. I have no intention of having to modify every application and widget I ever wrote with DynAPI 2 just to accomadate a grammerical correction. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:45 AM Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Proposed feature changes
> > --- Dan Steinman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some of my changes in 2.6 are costmetic also, such > > as setLocation() replacing moveTo(). > > It just hit me. Why change moveTo() to setLocation()? > moveTo() consist of only 6 characters while > setLocation() consist of 11 characters. In essence > setLocation uses 5 byes more than moveTo. This might > seem insignificant now but wait until numerous calls > are made using setLocation. > > Just a thought! > > -- > Raymond > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals > http://personals.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
