isn't there any possibilities to generate the docs right out of
javascript-source and therefore skip the need to update two files
every time?

/martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Laszlo Teglas
> Sent: den 19 november 2001 16:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] dynapi documentation
> 
> 
> I haven't had a chance to set up doxygen yet. But to answer 
> your question,
> yes. Since we decided to use doxygen, we should use the 
> built-in doxygen
> commands as you recommended. But to be clear, are we still 
> commenting the
> JavaScript source, or are we only commenting in doxygen the 
> Java mirror?
> 
> NanoFace =;^)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> martin ström
> Sent: November 19, 2001 4:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] dynapi documentation
> 
> 
> shouldn't we use the built-in doxygen-commands, like:
> 
> /**
>  * \class DynLayer
>  * \package dynapi.api
>  * \bried This class is used to manipulate Layers
>  * \example dynlayer.create.html
>  * \author (....)
>  * \version 1.0
>  * \bug (....)
>  * \deprecated (...)
>  * \param int clip[]
>  * return void
>  */
> 
> or something, reference:
> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/commands.html
> i haven't used doxygen before but i belive one of its advantages
> is the doxygen-commands.
> 
> /martin
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Laszlo Teglas
> > Sent: den 16 november 2001 21:35
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] dynapi documentation
> >
> >
> > I guess we should come up with a commenting standard. I
> > started to document
> > dynlayer.js.
> >
> > A sample of my commenting style:
> >
> > /**
> >    DynAPI Distribution
> >    DynLayer Class
> >    DynLayer.js      v1.71 Sun Nov 11 16:25:18 2001 UTC
> >
> >    The DynAPI Distribution is distributed under the terms of
> > the GNU LGPL
> > license.
> >
> >    The DynLayer inherits all methods and properties from DynObject.
> >    The DynLayer is the standard class used to manipulate "layers".
> > */
> >
> >
> > /**
> > Public Method
> > void setClip (int clip[])
> >
> > Sets the DynLayer's clipped area bound on its 4 sides
> > based on its absolute css position, using the 4 interger
> > values passed to the method.
> > (top,right,bottom,left)
> > Requires 4 intergers
> > */
> > DynLayer.prototype.setClip=function(clip) {
> >     var cc=this.getClip();
> >     for (var i=0;i<clip.length;i++) if (clip[i]==null)
> > clip[i]=cc[i];
> >     this.clip=clip;
> >     if (this.css==null) return;
> >     var c=this.css.clip;
> >     if (is.ns4) c.top=clip[0], c.right=clip[1], c.bottom=clip[2],
> > c.left=clip[3];
> >     else this.css.clip="rect("+clip[0]+"px "+clip[1]+"px
> > "+clip[2]+"px
> > "+clip[3]+"px)";
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > Public Method
> > int getClip ()
> >
> > Returns the DynLayer's clipped area bound on its 4 sides
> > based on its absolute css position.
> > (top,right,bottom,left)
> > Returns 4 intergers
> > */
> > DynLayer.prototype.getClip=function() {
> >     if (this.css==null || !this.css.clip) return [0,0,0,0];
> >     var c = this.css.clip;
> >     if (c) {
> >             if (is.ns4) return [c.top,c.right,c.bottom,c.left];
> >             if (c.indexOf("rect(")>-1) {
> >                     c=c.split("rect(")[1].split(")")[0].split("px");
> >                     for (var i=0;i<c.length;i++)
> > c[i]=parseInt(c[i]);
> >                     return [c[0],c[1],c[2],c[3]];
> >             }
> >             else return [0,this.w,this.h,0];
> >     }
> > };
> >
> > What does everyone think of this comment style? Anything we
> > need to add,
> > subtract from it? Once we agree on a style we can split up
> > the files and do
> > the grunt work. Since we've agreed to use doxygen, I would
> > like to hear from
> > experienced doxygen users as to what would be nice to have in
> > the comment
> > style.
> >
> > NanoFace =;^)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
> Matt Fair
> > Sent: November 16, 2001 2:40 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] dynapi documentation
> >
> >
> > So is it decided that we will be using Doxygen?
> > I would like to help out with the documentation effort.
> > What needs to be done in the effort?
> > How can people help?
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
> 


_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to