could you show some small code example of what you speak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eytan Heidingsfeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dynapi-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 8:21 AM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Widget Code
> Two things:
> a. In current widget code there are many times when you use privates (such
> as this.w) instead of the corresponding get method (this.getWidth()). I
know
> we are looking to save bytes everywhere but if it is a reoccurring line
then
> write var w = this.getWidth() and other wise you should just use the
method
> name. That's why they are there. Is there a reason for this behavior other
> then bytes saved?
> 2. While writing my widget spec implementation I had an idea that all
visual
> components should be passed as a first parameter a parent(and then in the
> constructor a call this.parent.addChild(this.dynlayer). I was wondering
what
> you guys think of this convention? It seems very comfortable to me but I
> want to know what you guys think?
> Otherwise I'd like to let you know that I finished with the base classes
> (except I still need to decide exactly in what method I would like to
handle
> events specifically). It has some cool code so that in an inherited class
> after overriding a method you can call this.inherited("create()") for
> instance and it will work.
> 8an
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
