I contacted Pascal to ask about what's happening with DomLib, thought I forward his reply to the list - hoping to maybe spark up a little discussion on his comment of DynAPI being held back and talk about what's happening in the future. I'm new to the project but I want to get involved as a I see DynAPI being a tremendous help in my projects, so having an idea of a roadmap and some of the obstacles DynAPI is facing would be fantastic - I would be more than happy, with your help, to compile this document if nothing is available at the moment.
How many active developers does DynAPI have? Do we know who is working on what? What needs to be worked on, but doesn't have a current owner? What are DynAPI's current obstacles, and what are the proposals - and what roadmap is proposed? Whats being done about taking advantages of new technology and standards, but giving some backwards compatibility - maybe a two tier system? Mark >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: "Pascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Mark Proctor'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: is DomLib being actively developed? >Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 11:20:44 +0100 >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 >Importance: Normal >X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I basically stopped with DOMLib because it did all I wanted it to do :) >I was just creating to show others that a DOM compatible only library is >so easy and simple to develop and use and that backwards compatibility >is totally not needed anymore (and holding back things like DynAPI) > >Cant say much about judelib or domapi, so youll just have to check them >out :) > >(btw my current believes are that custom code is far better then any >api, especially for DOM browsers, cause basically DOM is already an api) > >cu, > >Pascal >http://www.dynamic-core.net > > > > >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: Mark Proctor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Verzonden: zondag 24 maart 2002 4:39 >Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Onderwerp: is DomLib being actively developed? > > >Hows DomLib going - I notice there hasn't been a release since last >June. >I'm looking to get involved in a DHTML Layer API - have been looking at >DynAPI which seems pretty cool and is still under active development. >I'm >not interested in backwards compatibility either and really looking to >use >something that gives the best user experience. I'm also looking at >Judelib >and domApi - any opinions on these? Just want to make sure I make the >right >choice in API. > >Cheers > >Mark _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
