I've been taking a bit of a break lately but I am still moving forward with DynAPI 2.9+. Not too much has changed from the 2.9 version released earlier, mostly bug fixes and minor tweaks, and a reworked event system (that still has some flaws). It actually wasn't my intent to be working on DynAPI behind closed doors, but our current project necessitated it (working with 2 separate cvs tree's on the same source would not be fun). This can probably change soon though.
My widget set on top of DynAPI will still require a lot of work before it's finished. But this is where I'll eventually be spending my time since DynAPI itself is pretty solid as it stands. I will eventually have to write some doc's covering my widgets. I don't know what happened to the DynAPI documentation project that was discussed a while ago. If some of you want to write DynAPI doc's that would certainly help out a great deal considering it would be quite some time before I'd be able to write them. Dan Steinman On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:26:18PM -0400, Robert Rainwater wrote: > > Tuesday, April 2, 2002, 3:20:14 PM, Mark wrote: > > >>ACTIVE DEVELOPERS: > > Agreed but we can at least start somewhere, piecing together what > > information we can find, even if it adjacent on loosely related - > > the acorn must be planted. > > The next branch of the DynAPI is not dead. Dan has been working on the > codebase for a while. I've been using it for a project I'm working on > and it is quite stable. You can see a snapshot of the DynAPI code at > http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/snapshot/dynapi2x_2002_04_10.zip. I will > not try to speak for Dan on what his future development plans are. But > I know that once the code becomes more stable/complete that it will be > available on Sourceforge. Right now the code works on ns4, ie+ and > ns6. Support for Konqueror and Opera is on the wishlist. As for > development, maybe Dan should answer that one (hint hint). I know that > Dan plans on writing new/complete documentation for the new stuff as > well. It may also be possible to move the 2.9 cvs branch over to sf as > well. > > -- > Robert Rainwater > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
