Hello Dan,
I've just looked at it and you're correct. Firstly I
would suggest deleting the pathanim.js file and rename
the pathanim-full.js to pathanim.js. Then modify
dynapi.js to reflect the following:
this.add('dynapi.fx.Thread','thread.js','DynLayer');
this.add('dynapi.fx.PathAnimation','pathanim.js','Thread');
As for the other option of converting the
PathAnimation into a Timeline object sounds good. But
do you plan on adding more features it? If so how will
it differ From PathAnimation?
Dan S. should also be doing some work on the
pathanimation stuff, but I would suggest you go ahead
with your changes/implementation and then we look at
merging the two later if needs be.
PS. Remember to make the necessary changes to the
docs.
Many thanks.
Best regards,
--
Raymond Irving
--- Dan Willemsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Except that the 'advanced timeline' features in
> pathanim-full.js like
> the PathAnimation.add method are not included in
> Thread.js, only the
> functions from the pathanim.js are in thread.js.
> Should these be
> included in the thread.js too? Or should these be
> seperated, because
> they are large and are not always needed? The
> pathanim-glide example
> currently uses these functions to do a square
> path(not that it works
> right now anyways). (Just looked, the pathanim one
> does too)
>
> --
> Dan Willemsen
>
> At the beginning of pathanim-full.js:
>
> DS: the extra features of this version will
> possibly be rebuilt as an
> advanced timeline object
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
